ក្រុម រូបភាព ការបន្ទាន់សម័យ នានា វ៉ែប ថតឯកសារ
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
available memory from task manager
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
George2  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2008, 10:28 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
From: George2 <george4acade...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:28:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Jan 14 2008 10:28 am
Subject: available memory from task manager
Hello everyone,

I am using Windows Server 2003. I am confused about the available
(memory) value under Physical Memory category.

From search there are two meanings,

1. available means free physical memory, not used yet by any
application;
2. available means the total size of physical memory user application
could use (exclude System Cache and Kernel Memory, which user
application can not use), the user application may actually already
used some of them, and they are not *all* free.

(2) is from http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-6346_11-5071997.html

--------------------
Since you know that at this point the operating system is making 208
MB of physical memory available to running programs and that the Total
is 243 MB, you can come up with a rough estimate of the actual size of
the page file by subtracting the Total Commit Charge from the
Available Physical Memory. In this case, you end up with 35 MB.
--------------------

My question is, which one do you think is correct? :-)

thanks in advance,
George


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jerry Coffin  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2008, 10:36 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
From: Jerry Coffin <jcof...@taeus.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:36:41 -0700
Local: Mon, Jan 14 2008 10:36 am
Subject: Re: available memory from task manager
In article <f911a2eb-6f7d-45d5-b883-57d6f7c71154
@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, george4acade...@yahoo.com says...

> Hello everyone,

> I am using Windows Server 2003. I am confused about the available
> (memory) value under Physical Memory category.

> From search there are two meanings,

[ elided ]

> My question is, which one do you think is correct? :-)

Neither, really -- but it's off-topic here. I'd advise asking in
comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32, or (if you really want to get into
detail) microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel.

As you might guess from the mention of "detail", simple answers to this
question are either incorrect or impossible to understand without quite  
a bit of knowledge about the details of Windows.

--
    Later,
    Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
red floyd  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2008, 1:40 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
From: red floyd <no.s...@here.dude>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:40:08 -0800
Local: Mon, Jan 14 2008 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: available memory from task manager

George2 wrote:
> [redacted]

Do you even read the responses to your posts?

Do you even give a shit that people have told you over and over again
that you're off-topic here?  The topic of this newsgroup is C++, not
Windows Server 2003 and its virtual memory scheme?


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google