Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this thing?
In article <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > thing?
I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that size.
On Aug 27, 8:32 am, Lloyd Parsons <lloydpars...@mac.com> wrote:
> In article > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > thing?
> I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > size.
> For wired, I still use my older one.
I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> In article > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > thing?
> I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > size.
> For wired, I still use my older one.
I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the future before posting nonsense.
> > In article > > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > > thing?
> > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > > size.
> > For wired, I still use my older one.
> I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the > future before posting nonsense.
It's a terrible keyboard for typing. Unfortunately, I own far more Macs than you do.
> > > In article > > > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > > > thing?
> > > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > > > size.
> > > For wired, I still use my older one.
> > I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> > There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the > > future before posting nonsense.
> It's a terrible keyboard for typing. Unfortunately, I own far more > Macs than you do.
Funny.
I installed 7 new iMacs for a client and each user had the option of using the new aluminum keyboard or keeping their old one.
> > > > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > > > > thing?
> > > > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > > > > size.
> > > > For wired, I still use my older one.
> > > I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > > > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > > > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> > > There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the > > > future before posting nonsense.
> > It's a terrible keyboard for typing. Unfortunately, I own far more > > Macs than you do.
> Funny.
> I installed 7 new iMacs for a client and each user had the option of > using the new aluminum keyboard or keeping their old one.
MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 27, 8:32 am, Lloyd Parsons <lloydpars...@mac.com> wrote: > > In article > > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > > thing?
> > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > > size.
> > For wired, I still use my older one.
> I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
What lack of tactile feel? While it is a shorter stroke, the feel is there.
> > > In article > > > <34744ef7-0079-4b6c-a2b1-be4dbe4f1...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many of > > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the Church > > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on this > > > > thing?
> > > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at that > > > size.
> > > For wired, I still use my older one.
> > I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> > There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the > > future before posting nonsense.
> It's a terrible keyboard for typing. Unfortunately, I own far more > Macs than you do.
I don't agree. I use the wireless one on my mini and it is just fine. I still have the older wired one because there was no reason to change.
MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 27, 12:21 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <3ab814ff-3937-4e7e-b724-1222fdd85...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 27, 11:21 am, "John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > "MuahMan" <muah...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes it looks good and is nice and skinny. But be honest, how many > > > > > > of > > > > > > you replaced it with a regular keyboard? Something about the keys > > > > > > barely moving is bothersome. I'm sure the regular Mactards will say > > > > > > it's the best keyboard ever as they will get kicked out of the > > > > > > Church > > > > > > of Mac. But are they any normal Mac users that have an opinion on > > > > > > this > > > > > > thing?
> > > > > I like the new one for wireless, really makes it handy as hell at > > > > > that > > > > > size.
> > > > > For wired, I still use my older one.
> > > > I agree about the wireless one without the number pad would be great > > > > for HTPC, just if you do a lot of typing the lack of tactile feel on > > > > the aluminum wired one is thumbs down!
> > > > There IS tactile feel on the Aluminum keyboard. Try using one in the > > > > future before posting nonsense.
> > > It's a terrible keyboard for typing. Unfortunately, I own far more > > > Macs than you do.
> > Funny.
> > I installed 7 new iMacs for a client and each user had the option of > > using the new aluminum keyboard or keeping their old one.
