The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled) snotted:
> "Tattoo Vampire" <sitt...@this.computer> stated in post > 1aqa7s1xiyoyk....@this.domain.or.that on 8/27/08 3:25 AM:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> EXIF.
>>> Look it up.
>> Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut.
> You did not look up "EXIF" did you? LOL!
Why should he? His pictures did not contain any EXIF data, so your "argument" of "EXIF" is just another lunacy of you, Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser
Face it: You have shown again what kind of incompetent lying twit you are.
Don't you have to forge some PDFs showing those two files with EXIF data, Michael Snot Glasser? -- We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms.
Peter Köhlmann wrote: >The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled) snotted: >> "Tattoo Vampire" <sitt...@this.computer> stated: >>> Snit wrote: >>>> EXIF.
>>>> Look it up.
>>> Nice try, but you're still full of it, Splut.
>> You did not look up "EXIF" did you? LOL!
>Why should he? His pictures did not contain any EXIF data, so >your "argument" of "EXIF" is just another lunacy of you, >Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser
>Face it: You have shown again what kind of incompetent lying twit you are.
Jezuz. What a worthless, trolling, piece of shit, this Sn^Hhit troll is. He makes a jackass of himself regarding the "old calendar on the wall", then goes on to make a *complete* jackass of himself on this EXIF issue.
And he's still pretending that he's not just been utterly humiliated! LOL'ing and baldly lying that it "seems" that he was wrong about us being able to view EXIF data, which, I dare say, *everyone* in here is able to do.
The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled) snotted:
> "Tattoo Vampire" <sitt...@this.computer> stated in post > tiahonqyl6qv....@this.domain.or.that on 8/27/08 12:24 PM:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Wrong about what. Put the context back. Frankly your snipping to run >>> from your lies grows old.
>> Context my ass.
> Context is important. Stop snipping it all away.
What context, you dishonest twit? The context was date of the pictures. You mumbled "EXIF" You *lied* Michael Glasser. That is the simple truth. There was *no* EXIF data you could have been talking about, you made it all up
> I caught you openly lying about my having called you... and now you keep > running to your silly picture as if that somehow makes it alright for you > to openly lie about my actions.
> As far as your silly picture: You corrected me and said it was *26* and > not > *28* as I wrote. Yup, I made a typo. Get over it. Freak out over > something else.
He is not talking or "freaking out" over a typo. He is talking about you making up "EXIF data" out of full cloth
And again Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser totally disregards the proof that he was caught lying *again* with the stupid "EXIF" claim -- I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled) snotted:
< snip >
> Bottom line, though, as I noted EXIF data contains dates. Seriously, I am > surprised how many people in COLA did not know that.
And you can certainly give us the Msg-IDs, Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser
After all, it is *your* lie about EXIF data -- What happens if a big asteroid hits Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. --- Dave Barry
>>> Bottom line, though, as I noted EXIF data contains dates. Seriously, I am >>> surprised how many people in COLA did not know that.
> You're a fscking liar. There is NO evidence that we didn't know that.
> Seriously, I am surprised at what a lying cretin you are.
Can you read?
Yes? Good. Now reread what he said and wonder at your own stupidity once more when you said "we didn't". He said "how many" not ALL. Idiot. You seem to need a top up of your meds.
>>>> Bottom line, though, as I noted EXIF data contains dates. Seriously, I >>>> am surprised how many people in COLA did not know that.
>> You're a fscking liar. There is NO evidence that we didn't know that.
>> Seriously, I am surprised at what a lying cretin you are.
> Can you read?
> Yes? Good. Now reread what he said and wonder at your own stupidity once > more when you said "we didn't". He said "how many" not ALL.
And Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser lied then as well. As usual
> Idiot. You seem to need a top up of your meds.
Another fine "true linux advocacy post" from the "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user", "swapfile expert", "X specialist", "CUPS guru", "USB-disk server admin", "defragger professional", "newsreader magician", "hardware maven", "time coordinator", "email sage" and "OSS culling committee chairman" Hadron Quark, aka Hans Schneider, aka Richard, aka Damian O'Leary -- Eternity is a very long time, especially towards the end
>>>>> Bottom line, though, as I noted EXIF data contains dates. Seriously, I >>>>> am surprised how many people in COLA did not know that.
>>> You're a fscking liar. There is NO evidence that we didn't know that.
>>> Seriously, I am surprised at what a lying cretin you are.
>> Can you read?
>> Yes? Good. Now reread what he said and wonder at your own stupidity once >> more when you said "we didn't". He said "how many" not ALL.
> And Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser lied then as well. As usual
So you think NO ONE did not know that?
You DO realise that "how many" does not mean a lot necessarily?
Peter, don't play word games. You're not very good at it. Stick to telling lies and linking peoples real life details with their COLA escapades in order to damage their potential and possibly their families.
>>>>>> Bottom line, though, as I noted EXIF data contains dates. Seriously, >>>>>> I am surprised how many people in COLA did not know that.
>>>> You're a fscking liar. There is NO evidence that we didn't know that.
>>>> Seriously, I am surprised at what a lying cretin you are.
>>> Can you read?
>>> Yes? Good. Now reread what he said and wonder at your own stupidity once >>> more when you said "we didn't". He said "how many" not ALL.
>> And Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser lied then as well. As usual
> So you think NO ONE did not know that?
It does not matter. *That* was never the topic, Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser tried to change it to that because his lie about the EXIF data had horribly backfired
> You DO realise that "how many" does not mean a lot necessarily?
You DO realize that you are *again* siding with the most dishonest swine ever to post on usenet?
> Peter, don't play word games. You're not very good at it. Stick to > telling lies and linking peoples real life details with their COLA > escapades in order to damage their potential and possibly their > families.
Another fine "true linux advocacy post" from the "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user", "swapfile expert", "X specialist", "CUPS guru", "USB-disk server admin", "defragger professional", "newsreader magician", "hardware maven", "time coordinator", "email sage" and "OSS culling committee chairman" Hadron Quark, aka Hans Schneider, aka Richard, aka Damian O'Leary
-- Microsoft software doesn't get released - it escapes, leaving a trail of destruction behind it.
