<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.sys.mac.advocacy Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy</link>
  <description>The Macintosh computer family compared to others.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/6abe37fcd83e46e0?show_docid=6abe37fcd83e46e0</link>
  <description>
  (in article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;0fed08be-5c4b-4e9a-bb40-02563 9742...@x16g2000prn.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; Not to mention that market share is based on units sold, not the OS that the &lt;br&gt; end user installs (or doesn&#39;t install) on it. IOW, whether a person buying a &lt;br&gt; Mac keeps OSX or erases it in favor of Windows, its still a Mac sale and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/6abe37fcd83e46e0?show_docid=6abe37fcd83e46e0</guid>
  <author>
  sonn...@audiosanatorium.com
  (Sonnova)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:25:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/eab094cd4be08afa?show_docid=eab094cd4be08afa</link>
  <description>
  (in article &amp;lt;CJudnZo9jeVgOPrUnZ2dnUVZ_qDin ...@giganews.com&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; Oh, give us a f__king break! Is it logical for any significant number of &lt;br&gt; people to buy a Mac and replace OSX with Windows? Of course it isn&#39;t. You&#39;re &lt;br&gt; grasping at straws here. Sure, there might be some who do it. I can imagine a &lt;br&gt; situation where some long-term Windows user has purchased a Mac to see what
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/eab094cd4be08afa?show_docid=eab094cd4be08afa</guid>
  <author>
  sonn...@audiosanatorium.com
  (Sonnova)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:22:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/cf02e9085a65fa42?show_docid=cf02e9085a65fa42</link>
  <description>
  (in article &amp;lt;2qydnXb1u-uflfrUnZ2dnUVZ_i2dn ...@giganews.com&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; What does that have to do with the subject at hand? Which is, in case you&#39;ve &lt;br&gt; forgotten, that paying the extra money for a Mac (because Macs ARE more &lt;br&gt; expensive) and then removing Mac OSX to onstall Vista in it&#39;s stead is STUPID &lt;br&gt; and for that reason, not many people do it.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/cf02e9085a65fa42?show_docid=cf02e9085a65fa42</guid>
  <author>
  sonn...@audiosanatorium.com
  (Sonnova)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:13:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Psystar sales booming!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/a99cd6fc33c6f180/fd1985e8b4a55ab1?show_docid=fd1985e8b4a55ab1</link>
  <description>
  (in article &amp;lt;znu-7DA279.02003509012...@new s.individual.net&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; Very disingenuous. While there are open source apps that allow Linux users to &lt;br&gt; do many of the things that Mac or Windows users can do, these apps are MOSTLY &lt;br&gt; not as good as the &amp;quot;shrink-wrapped&amp;quot; apps, don&#39;t have the features and many &lt;br&gt; aren&#39;t as stable. Many certainly don&#39;t get upgraded as often (and therefore
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/a99cd6fc33c6f180/fd1985e8b4a55ab1?show_docid=fd1985e8b4a55ab1</guid>
  <author>
  sonn...@audiosanatorium.com
  (Sonnova)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:04:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Winows 7 - Same Old Sluggish Microsoft Crap</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/59db5841fcbb926a?show_docid=59db5841fcbb926a</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;MuahMan&amp;quot; &amp;lt;muah...@gmail.com&amp;gt; stated in post &lt;br&gt; 719d7ec1-aa8e-4ac8-8ee8-918465 72e...@r38g2000vbi.googlegroup s.com on 1/9/09 &lt;br&gt; 3:23 PM: &lt;br&gt; Show me how with a demonstration. :)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/59db5841fcbb926a?show_docid=59db5841fcbb926a</guid>
  <author>
  use...@gallopinginsanity.com
  (Snit)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:40:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Winows 7 - Same Old Sluggish Microsoft Crap</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/162ca0a727f3e435?show_docid=162ca0a727f3e435</link>
  <description>
  Please Die!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/162ca0a727f3e435?show_docid=162ca0a727f3e435</guid>
  <author>
  muah...@gmail.com
  (MuahMan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:23:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Winows 7 - Same Old Sluggish Microsoft Crap</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/6b2dd7f01ba912fe?show_docid=6b2dd7f01ba912fe</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;John&amp;quot; &amp;lt;nos...@nospam.com&amp;gt; stated in post &lt;br&gt; M8GdnSirt7JkJPrUnZ2dnUVZ_gqdn. ..@giganews.com on 1/9/09 1:56 PM: &lt;br&gt; Steve Mackay was too busy begging me to show, again, the quotes where Steve &lt;br&gt; Carroll admitted to using multiple identities... and also where Steve &lt;br&gt; Carroll has admitted to doing what he accuses others of.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/6b2dd7f01ba912fe?show_docid=6b2dd7f01ba912fe</guid>
  <author>
  use...@gallopinginsanity.com
  (Snit)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:00:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: What would it be like if... as opposed to what it IS like...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/4806c589516635ec/db13c05e5260cb81?show_docid=db13c05e5260cb81</link>
  <description>
  ... many other posters have said a lot of justifiably negative things &lt;br&gt; about the dishonest troll named Snit and Snit is throwing a public &lt;br&gt; tantrum about it.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/4806c589516635ec/db13c05e5260cb81?show_docid=db13c05e5260cb81</guid>
  <author>
  fretw...@comcast.net
  (Steve Carroll)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:50:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/a42d5265240748ef?show_docid=a42d5265240748ef</link>
  <description>
  The Devil&#39;s in the details ... what&#39;s your level of precision (or &lt;br&gt; lattitude) that you&#39;re applying when you claim &#39;corresponding&#39;? &lt;br&gt; FWIW, I don&#39;t dispute that the trend of both has been generally &amp;quot;up&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve just not bothered to do any serious analysis of the two data &lt;br&gt; sources to see to what degree they correlate, partly because the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/a42d5265240748ef?show_docid=a42d5265240748ef</guid>
  <author>
  recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com
  (-hh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:45:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Windows 7 - THREE times longer to boot to a usable desktop then 10.5.6</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/6a23c94c06b489e4/13c56c029ffc8be6?show_docid=13c56c029ffc8be6</link>
  <description>
  No worries, betas at M$ are a marketing stunt. &lt;br&gt; If they had followed any of the input from the Vista beta than would &lt;br&gt; we should not have the Vista that we now know and loath. To be fair I &lt;br&gt; think that the problem that most people have with Vista is that M$ &lt;br&gt; took so long to come out with it, hyped it as ^sliced baked goods and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/6a23c94c06b489e4/13c56c029ffc8be6?show_docid=13c56c029ffc8be6</guid>
  <author>
  thundercle...@yahoo.com
  (Thundercleets)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:40:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/8c04083fff4c8882?show_docid=8c04083fff4c8882</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;CJudnZo9jeVgOPrUnZ2dnUVZ_qDin ...@giganews.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Except that the Net Applications site does show corresponding increase &lt;br&gt; in Mac OS X market share.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/8c04083fff4c8882?show_docid=8c04083fff4c8882</guid>
  <author>
  alangba...@telus.net
  (Alan Baker)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:28:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leopard market share???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/34bc0f3f740e01df?show_docid=34bc0f3f740e01df</link>
  <description>
  Steve&#39;s simply trying to dodge responsibility for substantiating an &lt;br&gt; assertion that he made of his own free will. &lt;br&gt; By that logic, we&#39;re all driving around in flying cars, based on &lt;br&gt; hundreds of articles over the past 50 years published in _Popular &lt;br&gt; Science_ and similar magazines...or in electric cars, based on just
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/79e80700b1e4c8ff/34bc0f3f740e01df?show_docid=34bc0f3f740e01df</guid>
  <author>
  recscuba_goo...@huntzinger.com
  (-hh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:21:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Maccies know it&#39;s a bad week when...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/b1f3b4642d319a84/9359a4bc25dd10be?show_docid=9359a4bc25dd10be</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;2qydnXH1u-v4lPrUnZ2dnUVZ_i0AA ...@giganews.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m saying Apple didn&#39;t have as much to present because Apple&#39;s &lt;br&gt; development and release schedules are no longer based around when &lt;br&gt; MacWorld occurs, which they pretty obviously used to be. &lt;br&gt; And that one of the reasons Apple probably changed that policy is that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/b1f3b4642d319a84/9359a4bc25dd10be?show_docid=9359a4bc25dd10be</guid>
  <author>
  z...@fake.invalid
  (ZnU)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:12:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Winows 7 - Same Old Sluggish Microsoft Crap</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/75970d42b65e7cb2?show_docid=75970d42b65e7cb2</link>
  <description>
  John wrote: &lt;br&gt; So what is technically incompetent about not pirating it, or not having &lt;br&gt; a MSDN, or Technet account any longer? &lt;br&gt; So John, why not prove to us your technical prowess and prove to us on &lt;br&gt; how long it takes to install it? Take some videos and post it up. Until &lt;br&gt; then, I&#39;d say you&#39;re completely full of shit, like usual.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/65519a4edbc086d3/75970d42b65e7cb2?show_docid=75970d42b65e7cb2</guid>
  <author>
  mackay.st...@att.net
  (Steve Mackay)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:59:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Psystar sales booming!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/a99cd6fc33c6f180/02d77e7e6bcab0da?show_docid=02d77e7e6bcab0da</link>
  <description>
  ZnU wrote: &lt;br&gt; If you want to have comments on points, simply make them. &lt;br&gt; What you are doing is the equivalent of the typical Snot Glasser circus, &lt;br&gt; namely retroactivly claiming some &amp;quot;universal point&amp;quot; everyone else fails to &lt;br&gt; understand/respond to/prove/disprove/you name it &lt;br&gt; But it seems that *you* are unable to, and you yourself lack the mental
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.kh/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/a99cd6fc33c6f180/02d77e7e6bcab0da?show_docid=02d77e7e6bcab0da</guid>
  <author>
  peter.koehlm...@arcor.de
  (Peter Köhlmann)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:57:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
