sci.math Google Group

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

2010-03-16T05:15:27Z

Exactly! "The WAY in which they argued ... and intellectual dishonesty",
are hallmark of cranks or *crank-like* ones.

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

2010-03-16T05:09:29Z

Provided that that object _actually conforms_ to the mathematical
definition of the word "model", of course.
_If it actually is_ a mathematical object.

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

2010-03-16T05:01:38Z

Apparently you didn't understand the short conversation. First, Daryl
asked me to give an example of a _nontrivial_ theorem. I gave him
just that.
Secondly, _he said even I wouldn't interested_ in it and that is wrong,
because _to me_ non-trivial theorems should reflect something new that
axioms have not reflected and in this case the theorem does remind me

Re: Space flows through energy

2010-03-16T04:58:40Z

Stupidity flows through inanity when
inanity exchanges dumbness or in BURT's mind.
Stupidity's burping flows through inanity when
inanity exchanges dumbness or in BURT's mind.

Re: Ste's Marxist rubbish

2010-03-16T04:52:51Z

Not really. I mention my IQ only because of the context. And while
people universally consider me "intelligent", I think they tend to
underestimate the amount of time and effort that goes into developing
the skills that they consider a manifestation of intelligence. If I
appear to have a large vocabulary, it's because I read a great deal,

Re: JSH: Twin primes probability correlation

2010-03-16T03:51:33Z

Except it isn't. The search for truth is about finding answers.
Knowing why.
Someone well-versed in current established theory on twin primes could
have thought they knew a lot about them and had their beliefs dashed
by a simple calculation, which correlates very well, indicating that a
tremendous amount of excess information--the prime distribution--can

Re: Is photon emission instanteous?

2010-03-16T03:34:40Z

If light is a wave what size does it start at?
When first emitted how large can a light wave be?
Mitch Raemsch

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

2010-03-16T03:32:37Z

That's why I said your attacking people's argument is very much borderline
_dishonesty_, if not outrightly so. I challenge you to actually provide a
single proof that you refuted my arguments that you'd call non-sense.

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

2010-03-16T03:22:39Z

Yeah. Bad cops called themselves cops too. Yes, they did give fine to
"law breakers" (i.e. some poor traffic drivers), and they'd brag about
it, trying to make people forget why they're called bad cops.

Re: US Supreme Court illogic of campaign financing as freedom of speech #519 Correcting Math

2010-03-16T02:36:08Z

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.co m> wrote in
Would it help if I told you I had my name legally changed to Deadrat?
I may be a coward, and on certain subjects I'm ignorant as well. But not
this one. I know what I'm talking about, and you don't. Let's count the
ways below.
And at least I don't snip your posts when I respond to them.

WELCOME TO THE NEW MATHEMATICS OF THE 21ST CENTURY HUMBLY INVERSE19 MATHEMATICS

2010-03-16T02:16:50Z

With the clear breakdown of Prime numbers including the latest post
that all Prime numbers are TANGENTS, and a CONVERGENT , or DIVERGENT,
and are all speified by numbers , starting for the convergence at
0.-- , and for the divergence at 5.-- (SEE THE SEPERATE POST).
This is a Break through and , Mathematicians are well advised to try

Re: Good Point by JSH

2010-03-16T02:16:25Z

There is exactly the same amount of conlcusive evidence that he *did*
have a proof. Your preference for the triple negative notwithstanding.
As to being "mealy mouthed", I would really have to work hard to reach
your level (not to mention your level of unintelligibility.
Meanwhile, have a nice day. I shan't spend more time replying to you.

Re: I Think Therefore I Am - rebuttal

2010-03-16T02:11:47Z

I don't see how he could reasonably be expected to accomplish
this given how very little in the way of surviving primary-source
information about Descartes asshole.
Marshall

Re: Topos theory: axiom of choice implies a topos is Boolean

2010-03-16T02:04:44Z

Thanks.

Re: 19/ 6.33333333333(11) = Precise 3, 1:3 INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS, DIALOGUE WITH YOUR MATHEMATICS

2010-03-16T01:48:53Z

On Mar 15, 5:23 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...@verizon.net>
wrote:
I always thought that Einstein's equation was
E = M*C^2. Where is the 8pi?
Bill J