sci.math Google Group

Re: Help residue tan(z)

solrac...@hotmail.com (Carl R.) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:56:36 UT

I think you are misunderstanding things here.
I just wanted to know if my proof that the other poles have the same
residue is correct, i.e what Mariano wrote.
I was not asking for a proof that tangent function is periodic, as I
already knew this but forgot to use this fact
in this problem, i.e I didn't see it immediately.

Re: JSH: Bottom line, academic fraud in math field

marcus_bruck...@yahoo.com — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:56:04 UT

Yep, you can. In the complex plane you can factor anything you
want in infinitely many ways. The number could be 13 or pi or
sqrt(137) or .004321 or anything else you want. And you can
distribute '7' or whatever you want in a way that depends on x.
The fact that you CAN choose to do that in the complex plane

Re: JSH: Bottom line, academic fraud in math field

reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com (Tim Smith) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:53:50 UT

In article
<4e83e3b4-9846-408a-a40e-5f0cc 5424...@i24g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com>,
Until you can address the simple counterexample that was given (the one
using the signum function) that completely destroys your argument, the
big picture is irrelevant.
Stop running from that and go seriously address it. (Your "addressing"

Re: The modern mathematical concept of infinity is indefensible

albst...@gmx.de (Albrecht) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:52:55 UT

David R Tribble schrieb:
The (natural) ordinal numbers can be bijected with the (natural)
cardinal numbers, that's the point. In fact, this is the unique
property of the natural numbers which makes them sui generis.
A cardinality which is greater than any natural number cannot "count"
the natural numbers since this number would be larger than the

Re: JSH: Bottom line, academic fraud in math field

uncle...@hate.spam.net (Uncle Al) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:45:03 UT

JSH wrote:
[snip crap]
If you are revolted by your fraudulent claims, shut up.
"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans"
Hey stooopid - have you cracked any RSA products recently? It's
serious big bucks when you do.
Ode to James Harris
Somebody said it couldn't be done,
But James with a chuckle replied

Re: The modern mathematical concept of infinity is indefensible

albst...@gmx.de (Albrecht) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:44:36 UT

David R Tribble schrieb:
No. The premise is false that there is a whole.
Best regards
Albrecht S. Storz

Re: Help residue tan(z)

tonic...@yahoo.com — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:36:46 UT

****************************** ****************************** *****
But if you're doing complex analysis you must ALREADY know some basic
trigonometry, right?
Well, perhaps you must also know that what is true about the cyclic
nature of the real trigonometric function tan x is also true about the
cyclic nature of the complex tan z...

Re: The modern mathematical concept of infinity is indefensible

albst...@gmx.de (Albrecht) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:33:31 UT

Joshua Cranmer schrieb:
Try to be accurate: "Actual infinity as it is used in ZFC makes no
sense."
And no insult please.
Best regards
Albrecht S. Storz

Re: "Machs" under/at/over MACH

j...@specsol.spam.sux.com — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:30:01 UT

There has been a very small number of real nuclear weapons getting
loose and a small number of dummy weapons (to keep the weight and
airplane characteristics real) being dropped in the past 60 years
or so.
The USAF didn't do practice runs with real weapons.
It is next to impossible to get a nuclear explosion out of a weapon

#121 Chapter 8, comparing 3D elliptic and hyperbolic geometry with 3D Euclidean; new book 2nd edition: New True Mathematics

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:19:25 UT

(snipped)
I am satisfied that what I am doing is correct and not a
misunderstanding.
So let me talk about what the above means for mathematics.
It all starts with ALL Possible Digit Arrangements where Euclidean
geometry Reals are All Possible Digit Arrangements of Reals
and where Elliptic and Hyperbolic Geometry are All Possible Digit

Re: "Machs" under/at/over MACH

headmas...@hogwarts.physics (Androcles) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:16:50 UT

Dear hanson:
...
[link]
[link]
[link]
... the post by VitPuma
I don't ask you to believe me. Just that there is a good bit of

Re: JSH: Bottom line, academic fraud in math field

amz...@gmail.com (amzoti) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:12:13 UT

Do you matherbate to all of your nonsensical, erroneous, narcissistic
and delusional postings?
You liar, cheat and charlatan!
You are one of the most dishonest fraudsters and snake oil salesmen I
have ever seen.
On top of that, you are a crank, troll and kook.
You even made the crank page back in 2000! Yes 2000! Again 2000! It is

Circular Curve Path

k...@notmail.com (KBH) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:11:02 UT

Calculate a circular curve path through a given circular curve width while
being tangent to the midpoint of the inner curve:
[link]

Re: Is the sky still falling?

twir...@bigfoot.com (Angus Rodgers) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:09:20 UT

Reading a little way into the paper, I see that Prof. Bornat
himself has come to [at least some of] the same conclusions,
the hard way:
"Programming teachers, being programmers and therefore formalists,
are particularly prone to the ‘deductive fallacy’, the notion that
there is a rational way in which knowledge can be laid out, through

Re: "Machs" under/at/over MACH

dl...@cox.net (dlzc) — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:06:18 UT

Dear hanson:
...
[link]
[link]
[link]
... the post by VitPuma
I don't ask you to believe me. Just that there is a good bit of